47/100 AI Visibility Score
Harbor Grove Dental appeared in 11 of 22 scored responses. That is 3 points below the working target.
Sample Seenward AI Visibility AuditPractice market: St. Petersburg, Florida
Across 1 AI system, this audit measures how often Harbor Grove Dental appeared and whether its website was cited.
Executive Summary
Harbor Grove Dental appeared in 11 of 22 scored responses. That is 3 points below the working target.
This sample contains one completed AI system result, so there is no cross-engine spread to compare.
Confirm which sedation options are currently offered, at which location, and by which qualified providers. Then align only those dentist-approved facts across the existing website and public profiles.
AI Visibility Score · Seenward Model Standing methodology
It summarizes how often the practice was named, supported by its website, placed prominently, and visible across eligible question types.
Higher is better: more of the fixed 22 responses naming the practice, citing its website, placing it in the first three, and covering more categories increase the score.
Local response context
11 target mentions11 of 22 responses
Incidental co-mentions
Context only—not a competitor leaderboard.
See the response contextIncidental co-mentions from the same 22 discovery responses. The set was not predefined or adjusted for proximity, market share, or search volume; it is not a complete competitor benchmark.
Recommended actions
Actions are ordered by the clearest evidence gap. They do not promise rankings or patient volume; re-test after approved changes are public.
Developer handoff: After the dentist confirms the underlying facts, share Actions 2 and 3 with your web developer.
Confirm which sedation options are currently offered, at which location, and by which qualified providers. Then align only those dentist-approved facts across the existing website and public profiles.
Compliance review before publishing: A licensed dentist should confirm the service terminology, provider qualifications, permit status, and location-specific claims against applicable dental-board advertising rules. For Florida practices, review Fla. Stat. §466.017 and §466.019. This is a review flag, not legal advice.
Done looks like: One approved fact sheet and matching corrections to the existing service page and structured data.
AI responses returned inconsistent details about insurance, first visits, and scheduling. Align the website and profiles around one verified set of facts without implying real-time availability.
Done looks like: A verified fact sheet covering hours, phone, insurance language, scheduling, and accessibility.
The practice name and core location were consistent, but provider and service relationships were incomplete across public profiles. Correct existing records; do not add unsupported claims or solicit scripted reviews.
Done looks like: Three corrected profiles with the same approved practice, provider, and location facts.
Keep the prompts, engines, run count, scoring version, and location scope unchanged so movement is interpretable.
How the score is built
Each input earns a fixed share of the 100 available points. Counts are shown beside the points so the result can be checked against the evidence.
46.73 of 100 before final rounding · component labels rounded
11 of 22 discovery responses named the practice.
How often the practice appeared when its name was not included in the test question.7 first-party citations across 22 scored responses · 64% of practice mentions.
Whether the AI response linked to first-party evidence from the practice.8 top-three placements across 22 scored responses · 73% of practice mentions.
Whether the practice was prominent when options were listed.3 of 5 eligible query categories reached 50% inclusion.
Whether visibility extended beyond one narrow question type.Need the math? The complete normalization formula, rounding note, repeat-run method, and sensitivity table are preserved in the Technical Appendix.
Discovery indicators
Each bar uses the eligible response count shown beside it. The first three use all 22 discovery responses; the access bar uses only 6 access-intent responses.
The practice was named when a prospective patient asked without using its name.
The AI response connected the practice to first-party public evidence.
The practice was prominent enough to be compared early when options were listed.
Public scheduling, insurance, arrival, or new-patient questions surfaced the practice.
Response consistency
Executive snapshot
Three visibility conclusions drawn from public information—not advice about services, treatment, or business strategy.
The practice appeared in four of six general-discovery responses, usually supported by its location and family-care pages.
The practice selected sedation dentistry for testing, but its website and public profiles did not describe the same verified options and provider information.
The tested model did not name the practice in either urgent-care response. The sample intake marked urgent care as offered, but the audit did not independently establish current availability or scheduling terms.
Scoring eligibility
A category marked Excluded may still matter to a business, but Seenward does not treat absence as a visibility failure when the practice did not confirm that service.
Visibility by query category
These categories show where the practice appeared in the controlled AI responses. A gap does not mean the practice should add, remove, or prioritize a service.
Observed local context
This fact applies only to these exact responses. The other practices were incidental co-mentions, not a predefined or market-share-adjusted competitor cohort.
How to read it: Co-mention frequency shows relative exposure inside this test; the AI Visibility Score separately measures reliability, evidence, prominence, and breadth.
Named in 11 of 22 discovery responses.
Provisional set: These fictional practices represent incidental names found in the same 22 discovery responses. The set was not predefined or adjusted for proximity, market share, or search volume, and no separate competitor audits were run. A real set is reviewed before delivery and is presented as co-mention context—not a competitor ranking.
Public footprint
Official identity, professional licensing, profiles, reviews, and citation sources are kept separate. A record match is never silently promoted into a stronger claim.
Practice name, location, phone, and clinicians were consistent across the sample evidence set.
Illustrative sourceThe sample clinician name and practice location were represented as matched for demonstration purposes.
Illustrative sourceReview themes support friendly communication, but rarely describe anxiety-specific care or what helped patients feel comfortable.
Illustrative sourceReview these mentions before reusing operational, service, or credential statements. A missing first-party citation is not proof of error; verify the claim before publication.
Supporting website check · not part of the AI Visibility Score
This diagnostic identifies website conditions that may contribute to the result. It does not prove why an engine included or omitted the practice.
Name, city, phone, and primary website identity agree across the pages reviewed.
The website and public profiles do not state the same verified sedation options, location, and provider information.
The location is easy to verify. Parking and accessibility details could be more specific.
Basic organization data is present, but service and clinician relationships are not expressed consistently.
Important pages can be accessed without scripts or login. Several headings could describe the page purpose more precisely.
Evidence library
Use the response register to inspect the exact prompt, engine, run, unmodified answer, mention decision, and cited sources.
The browser report is the evidence record of record. Reopen the private link in the delivery email to inspect full answers and sources; this PDF preserves the protocol and engine totals without reproducing dozens of long responses.
s01OpenAI ChatGPTrecognition · run 1Mentioned1s02OpenAI ChatGPTrecognition · run 2Mentioned1s03OpenAI ChatGPTgeneral-dentist · run 1Mentioned1s04OpenAI ChatGPTgeneral-dentist · run 2Mentioned0s05OpenAI ChatGPTnew-family · run 1Mentioned1s06OpenAI ChatGPTnew-family · run 2Mentioned0s07OpenAI ChatGPTanxious-patient · run 1Not mentioned0s08OpenAI ChatGPTanxious-patient · run 2Mentioned1s09OpenAI ChatGPTsedation-options · run 1Not mentioned0s10OpenAI ChatGPTsedation-options · run 2Not mentioned0s11OpenAI ChatGPTaccepting-patients · run 1Mentioned1s12OpenAI ChatGPTaccepting-patients · run 2Mentioned0s13OpenAI ChatGPTinsurance · run 1Mentioned1s14OpenAI ChatGPTinsurance · run 2Not mentioned0s15OpenAI ChatGPTaccessibility · run 1Mentioned1s16OpenAI ChatGPTaccessibility · run 2Not mentioned0s17OpenAI ChatGPTcommunication · run 1Mentioned1s18OpenAI ChatGPTcommunication · run 2Mentioned0s19OpenAI ChatGPTcredentials · run 1Not mentioned0s20OpenAI ChatGPTcredentials · run 2Not mentioned0s21OpenAI ChatGPTurgent-care · run 1Not mentioned0s22OpenAI ChatGPTurgent-care · run 2Not mentioned0s23OpenAI ChatGPTconvenient-care · run 1Not mentioned0s24OpenAI ChatGPTconvenient-care · run 2Not mentioned0Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
Saved AI response
Sources cited
No source citation was returned with this AI response.
gpt-5.6-luna · 22 scored · 2 recognition controls
Technical Appendix
01 · Test design
Definitions
AI response means one model’s saved answer to one prompt in one run. Read the full methodology
Recognition control: 2 of 2 responses named the practice when the question included its name. These controls are reported here and excluded from scoring.
02 · Engines included
The report tests dated API models with web search enabled; it does not reproduce free consumer chat interfaces. Each engine keeps its own saved responses, sources, and unrounded score before the cross-engine summary is calculated.
For each engine: (mentions ÷ scored responses × 55) + (website citations ÷ scored responses × 15) + (top-three placements ÷ scored responses × 15) + (eligible categories at or above 50% inclusion ÷ eligible categories × 15). The weights total 100. The four unrounded engine scores are averaged, then the overall result is rounded.
27.50 + 4.77 + 5.45 + 9.00 = 46.73, rounded to 47/100. Displayed engine cards are also rounded, so averaging the visible cards can differ by one point.
4 of 11 engine-prompt pairs named the practice in both runs; 3 changed between runs. These controlled paired prompts are not an independent random sample, so Seenward does not report a statistical confidence interval.
The 55/15/15/15 rubric emphasizes being named while preserving credit for first-party evidence, prominence, and breadth. It has not been validated against patient demand, revenue, or conversions.
Scope, privacy, and responsible use
It measures these prompts, engines, runs, and public sources—not SEO rank, market share, clinical quality, patient demand, or future results.
Keep names, health information, appointment records, and private-system data out of Seenward and public AI tools.
A dentist should approve service, credential, insurance, availability, and outcome statements; regulated claims also need applicable board-rule review.
Optional paid implementation · final section
The Seenward Implementation Kit turns approved findings into a reviewed, developer-ready package. The audit findings stand independently of this offer, and any qualified developer may implement them. Seenward prepares the materials; your dentist and web developer control what is published.
00_START_HERE.pdfA branded visual owner guide that explains the implementation order, responsibilities, completion gates, and optional materials.
03-05_IDENTITY_CODE_GUIDE.md · 03_PRACTICE_IDENTITY.jsonld · 04_PROVIDER_IDENTITY.jsonld · 05_VERIFIED_SERVICE.jsonldA plain-language developer guide plus JSON-LD drafts built only from confirmed practice, provider, location, and applicable existing-service facts.
Ratings, licenses, credentials, NPIs, and identity links are added only after entity-level verification. Generic registry search pages are not used as sameAs links.06_CRAWL_ACCESS_CHECKLIST.md · 07_ROBOTS_RECOMMENDATIONS.txt · 99_OPTIONAL_EXPERIMENTAL_LLMS.txtChecks whether important public pages are reachable by search and AI crawlers, then provides recommended crawl directives, an access checklist, and an optional experimental llms.txt draft.
llms.txt is optional and experimental. Seenward does not represent it as an indexing control or ranking signal and guarantees no retrieval, ranking, or visibility benefit.02_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.mdLists affected URLs, exact edits, snippets, owners, acceptance checks, and rollback notes.
08_SERVICE_PAGE_BRIEF.md · 09_FAQ_BRIEF.mdDraft outlines based only on services and facts verified by the practice.
10_PROFILE_CHECKLIST_GUIDE.md · 10_PROFILE_CONSISTENCY_CHECKLIST.csvA practice-manager guide and review sheet for aligning confirmed identity, location, contact, and service facts across profiles the practice controls.
11_90_DAY_OWNER_CHECKLIST.mdHelps the owner confirm the work remains public, preserve a simple record, and decide whether a fresh audit after 90 days should measure change against the original benchmark.
00_START_HERE.pdfA branded visual owner guide that explains the implementation order, responsibilities, completion gates, and optional materials.
02_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.mdLists affected URLs, exact edits, snippets, owners, acceptance checks, and rollback notes.
11_90_DAY_OWNER_CHECKLIST.mdHelps the owner confirm the work remains public, preserve a simple record, and decide whether a fresh audit after 90 days should measure change against the original benchmark.
03-05_IDENTITY_CODE_GUIDE.md · 03_PRACTICE_IDENTITY.jsonld · 04_PROVIDER_IDENTITY.jsonld · 05_VERIFIED_SERVICE.jsonldA plain-language developer guide plus JSON-LD drafts built only from confirmed practice, provider, location, and applicable existing-service facts.
Ratings, licenses, credentials, NPIs, and identity links are added only after entity-level verification. Generic registry search pages are not used as sameAs links.08_SERVICE_PAGE_BRIEF.md · 09_FAQ_BRIEF.mdDraft outlines based only on services and facts verified by the practice.
06_CRAWL_ACCESS_CHECKLIST.md · 07_ROBOTS_RECOMMENDATIONS.txt · 99_OPTIONAL_EXPERIMENTAL_LLMS.txtChecks whether important public pages are reachable by search and AI crawlers, then provides recommended crawl directives, an access checklist, and an optional experimental llms.txt draft.
llms.txt is optional and experimental. Seenward does not represent it as an indexing control or ranking signal and guarantees no retrieval, ranking, or visibility benefit.10_PROFILE_CHECKLIST_GUIDE.md · 10_PROFILE_CONSISTENCY_CHECKLIST.csvA practice-manager guide and review sheet for aligning confirmed identity, location, contact, and service facts across profiles the practice controls.